Education, Discipleship, and Spiritual Formation

 

 

 

Home

Alex Tang

Publications

Articles

Spiritual writing

 

Nurturing/ Teaching Courses

Engaging Culture

Spiritual Formation Institute

My Notebook

My blogs

 

Books Recommendation

Bookstore

---------------------

Medical notes

Medical Students /Paediatric notes

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Module description

This module is designed to enable leaders in Christian ministries to reflect on spiritual growth in a time of fluidity and change. Education institutions are in taters, seminaries are in retreat against the onslaught of emerging technologies, and churches are emptying of the younger generations seeking to be ‘spiritual but not religious’. In this module, we will examine the underlying principles of Christian education, discipleship, and spiritual formation process. We will also evaluate the inner life of educators, spiritual formation communities and its missional aspects. We will look at pedagogy in faith communities in this digital interconnected world.

 

 

Credits

This is a 3-credit module for the EdD program.

 

 

Module dates

·         Pre-campus preparation: 1st October to early November 2019.

·         On-campus component: 14-19 November 2019.

·         Post-campus reading and assignments: mid November to 30 December 2019.

 

 

Objectives

The expected major outcome of this module is that you will have reflected on where you are in your ministry journey, understand the dynamics of formative and transformative aspects of your ministry, and be equipped to develop a pedagogy of spiritual growth both physically and in Cyberspace.

 

By the end of this module it is hoped you will have

1.      Reflected on the pedagogy, and affirmed the formative and transformative aspects of your ministry.

2.      Identified the strengths and weaknesses of your own spiritual growth.

3.      Understand the nature of spiritual growth and its importance as the task of the Christian faith community.

4.      Reviewed the aspects of person-in-formation, persons-in-community, and persons-in-mission developments in your local faith communities.

5.      Expand our concept of our sacred space by extending it into Cyberspace.

 

Themes

 

1.      Spiritual Growth in a Culture of Fluidity and Change

2.      Person-in-formation (Knowing God and Knowing Self)

3.      Persons-in-community formation

4.      Persons-in-mission formation

5.      Pedagogy in a digital age with emerging technologies

 

 

On-campus sessions

 

The following outline is a guide to the on-campus component. However there is scope for some flexibility based on the developing class dynamics and needs.

 

 

Day

Themes

On-campus discussions

Reading & resources

– selections

 

Day 1: Thurs

14 Nov

2019

Spiritual Growth in a Culture of Fluidity and Change

Presentations:

Summary of set texts (from toolboxes);

Case Studies (DESCRIPTIONS)

Tacey,The Postsecular Sacred; Drane, Globalisation of Spirituality; Lovelace, Sanctification Gap; Seymour, Approaches to Christian education; Wilkins, Disciples;

 

Day 2:

Fri

15 Nov 2019

 

Person-in-formation (Knowing God & Knowing Self)

Presentations:

Summary of set texts (from toolboxes);

Case Studies (DESCRIPTIONS)

Anderson, God our Father..shame; Evan Howard, Discipleship in a Post Modern World; Porter. Sanctification in a new key; Wink, Mark’s education of the Apostles; Gruenberg, Axes of formation; Johnson, CSF in the age of ‘whatever’; Wilhoit, Only God’s love counts;

 

Day 3: Sat

16 Nov 2019

Silent Retreat (9am-5pm)

El Sanctuary,

Batu Gajah

www.elsanctuary.com

 

Guided retreat

 

 

Day 4 Sun

17 Nov 2019

9.30am Worship at Covenant Baptist Church, Malacca

·         corporate worship & sharing

·         observe this church’s education, discipleship and spiritual formation

 

Day 5: Mon

18 Nov 2019

Persons-in-community formation and persons-in-mission formation

Presentations:

Summary of set texts (from toolboxes);

Case Studies (DESCRIPTIONS)

Mulholland, Spiritual Formation in Christ; Averbeck, Spirit community mission; Baker, Mission in Johannine discipleship;

 

Day 6:

Tues

19 Nov 2019

 

Pedagogy in a digital age with emerging technologies

Issues arising during the on-campus time

Tang, PBL in theological education; Gorman, Educating the reflective practitioner;

         

 

Sessions for each day will generally begin at 9.00 a.m. and go through till late afternoon. Each day will begin with lectio divina: spiritual reading and reflection on a passage of Scripture which speaks to the subject of this module.

 

 

Reading and resources for the module

You are required to come to the on-campus sessions prepared to reflect, discuss and present your experience. It is expected that you will have engaged with a reasonable amount of this material before arrival for the on-campus sessions. I have uploaded numerous articles for your study. It is under EdBrite>Class Files>Module Reader.

 

 

Assessment

Participants will be assessed on their completed pre-campus, on-campus and post-campus assignments.

 

Refer to EdD program guidelines for the overall assessment and grading scale. Unless otherwise specified, written assignments should follow the guidelines in AGST Alliance’s Assignment presentation and writing style: A basic guide for AGST Alliance students. I prefer (author/date).

 

Submission of assignments

Assignments must be submitted via your account on EdBrite. Do not email me directly.

 

Ensure that you keep a copy of your submitted assignments in the event your sent copies do not upload satisfactorily.

 

Module assessment

It is expected that all participants will be engaged fully in the processes of the module. The assessable items include these:

 

A.    Pre-campus

1.      Critical book review paper (10%)

2.      Reading toolbox begun (10%)

3.      Case study – DESCRIPTION STAGE only (10%)

 

B.     On-campus

1.      Toolbox presentation and discussion (5%)

 

2.      Case study – DESCRIPTION STAGE presentation & discussion leading into discussion (5%)

 

C.     Post-campus

1.      Case study completion (10%)

2.      Toolbox resubmission (10%)

3.      Research Paper (30%)

4.      Module reflection paper (10%)

 

 

Module Assessment

 

 

Assignment

Weightage

1

Book Review

10%

2

Toolbox - pre (10%); on campus (5%); post campus (10%)

25%

3

Case Study- pre (10%); on campus (5%); post campus (10%)

25%

4

Research Paper

30%

5

Reflection Paper

10%

 

See further details of these assessment items on below.

 

Submission dates – summary

 

Assessment item

Due date

Pre-campus

Critical book review paper (10%)

11 November 2019

Toolbox (begun) (10%)

11 November 2019

Case Study: DESCRIPTION  (10%)

11 November 2019

Post-campus

 Add to Toolbox and resubmit (10%)

19 December 2019

Completion of Case Study: adding new insights and new approaches (10%)

19 December 2019

Research paper (30%)

30 December 2019

Reflection paper (10%)

19 December 2019

 

 

Module assignment details

A.    Pre-campus assignments        

1.       Critical Book Review (10%)

Howard, Evan B. 2018. A Guide to Christian Spiritual Formation: How Scripture, Spirit, Community, and Mission Shapes Our Souls. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academics.  

 

See Appendix 1 for guidelines on writing a critical review

Length: 1200 words (5 pages, double spacing)

Submission date: 11 November 2019

 

2.      A “toolbox” of principles and concepts (10%)

 

Read these two textbooks to get ideas/concepts to fill up your “tool box”.  As you read these book, identify three ideas/concepts from each book.

 

Tang, Alex. 2014. Till We Are Fully Formed: Christian Spiritual Formation Paradigms in the English-Speaking Presbyterian Churches in Malaysia. Kuang: Malaysia Bible Seminary  

Wilhoit, James C. 2008. Spiritual formation as if the church mattered: Growing in Christ through community. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

 

As you read each book pre-campus, notice what concepts or principles seem most helpful to you in your ministry and also therefore in your assignments. Note the page number reference for each one. Use these to begin to construct a “toolbox” of references, organised according to the key ideas and useful principles which are emerging for you as you think about your ministry. These references will be very useful to you later.

 

This means that by the time you come to the on-campus intensive you will have a ‘working knowledge’ of these books – you will know your way around them and be familiar with the major ideas and concepts in them. One way to do this is as follows:

·         Start by reading through the table of contents and the preface, then move into the chapters.

·         In each chapter note the headings and sub-headings – read the first and last paragraph of each section, and perhaps the first sentence of each of the other paragraphs. Start looking for and entering into your toolbox the idea(s)/principle(s) from that chapter with the page number attached.

·         When you have an overview of the book, go back and read in detail the parts that catch your attention and seem most relevant to your place of work and ministry and add these to your toolbox.

·         Now review the other materials provided in Edbrite for this course and the list of other references at the end of these guidelines. Begin to read those most relevant to your ministry and start to add these to your toolbox.

 

(special thanks to Dr Allan Harkness and Dr Jennifer Turner for developing the “toolbox” pedagogy)

Length and format: There is no word limit. Your toolbox can be in the form of bullet points and/or a table with appropriate headings – make sure it is in a format that you can continue to add to as the module continues. This is intended to be useful to you long after the module itself is completed.

 

Example

 

 

 

Key concepts/ideas

References

Notes

1

Key to spiritual growth

“Christian spiritual formation is a process grounded on the biblical and theological concepts of restoration, relationship, and shalom” (Tang, 95, italic author’s)

 

 

Keep your quotes and reference in this column to separate it from your own thoughts and writings

·         Your own personal notes

·         What does these mean?

·         How will you apply this?

 

You initial ideas here. Add on to this during on campus discussion.

2

 

 

 

3

 

 

 

4

 

 

 

5

 

 

 

6

 

 

 

 

 

Prepare a Powerpoint presentation to present your main thoughts for the on-campus discussion.

Submission:  11 November 2019. Submit a copy to EdBrite. Keep adding to the toolbox during and after the on-campus sessions, and re-submit it for final grading near the end of the module.

Assessment criteria: Your final grade for this item takes into account modifications you make as a result of on-campus discussion and comments from the facilitator.

 

 

3.      Case Study (DESCRIPTION)     (10%)

 

Begin to prepare a Case Study. You may use your own church, para-church organisation or institution. Anything written or shared will be confidential.

(These case studies will form the basis of class discussion during the on-campus time, as we examine the conformative, formative, and transformative aspects of the curriculum in our faith communities. You will be asked to present this first part of your Case Study to the class, and respond to the discussion of it.)

The preliminary part of your Case Study to be prepared pre-campus, comprises the DESCRIPTION of the formative programs/curriculum in your church, institutions or faith community.

(During the on-campus sessions the class will engage with your Case Study. You will complete the write up of the full Case Study post-campus.) 

The DESCRIPTION of your situation should include:

·         A short summary of your church, institution, or faith community and its formative approach

·         What is the stated mission and vision for spiritual growth in this faith community?

·         What are the approaches/programs to achieve the mission?

·         What is your role and involvement in this faith community?

·         What is the organisation setup for this formative network?

·         What are the current challenges against spiritual formation and discipleship in this faith community?

·         What are the past challenges?

·         What resources are need?

·         What is the embedded theology of the formative processes?

 

You will be required to present to the class your DESCRIPTION for discussion (see below)

Length and format: Maximum 1000 words for this first stage.

Submission: 11 November 2019. Submit  a copy to Edbrite. (Following the class discussion of it and further work you wish to do on it, it will later form the first part of your final submission of your Case Study, due near the end of the module.)

Assessment criteria: This first stage will be part of the whole Case Study submitted post-campus.

 

 

B.     On-campus assessment           

It is anticipated that all students will make a valuable contribution to class discussions and look for synergies with others participating in the module, especially as each person presents the first stage of their Case Study. These case studies will add significant value to the module.

  

1.      Discussion of “toolbox” concepts (5%)

Use a PowerPoint presentation to share your main thoughts and discuss with the class.

2.      Presentation of the DESCRIPTION stage of your Case Study (5%)

You will present a summary to the class of the first stage of your Case Study (begun pre-campus).

Start with a brief DESCRIPTION of your setting, and then outline the issues you have identified. Class discussion will continue the examination of the formative and transformative elements.

Length and format: You can use a PowerPoint to present your description or other creative forms. Your description presentation should be the equivalent of half a page of notes. Reference can be made to toolbox entries here as well.

 

 

C.     Post-campus assignments

 1.      Case Study (Part 2)          (10%)

With the benefit of the on-campus work and class discussion, complete this case studies with insights, new concepts, or approaches you have benefited from the on campus discussions, your own reading, and reflection.

Length and format: Maximum 3500 words including the DESCRIPTION first stage.

Submission: Submit by 19 December 2019.

 

2.      Toolbox (update)(10%)

Format: See for pre-campus assignment. You have the opportunity to re-work your approach and add to it as a result of on-campus discussion and comments from the facilitator.

Submission: Submit by 19 December 2019.

 

3.      Research Paper  (30%)

Complete a research project on a topic, theory, issue, concept or practice related to this course. The student should decide on their topic by the end of the classes and discuss with me. Assessment criteria, see pp15.

 

This research process is developed in the following way:

-identify a problem/topic/issue. It must be related to spiritual formation communities.

-read up on the problem/topic/issue

-develop a thesis/abstract/outline/solution and framework

-read more and reflect on readings

-start writing

 

Length and Format: Maximum 3,500 words excluding footnotes and bibliography

Submission: Submit by 30 December 2019.

 

 

4.      Reflection Paper (10%)

Reflect what you have learn during your pre-module reading and on campus discussion. What new paradigms have you discovered about formation and transformation in local faith communities?

Length and format: Maximum of 1000 words.

Submission: Submit by 19 December 2019.

 

 

 

* * * * * * *

 

 

 

 


 

Reading list

 

Required texts

 

Howard, Evan B. 2018. A Guide to Christian Spiritual Formation: How Scripture, Spirit, Community, and Mission Shapes Our Souls. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academics.

 

Tang, Alex. 2014. Till We Are Fully Formed: Christian Spiritual Formation Paradigms in the English-Speaking Presbyterian Churches in Malaysia. Kuang: Malaysia Bible Seminary

 

Wilhoit, James C. 2008. Spiritual formation as if the church mattered: Growing in Christ through community. Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic.

 

 

 

Module Reader in EdBrite

 

I have uploaded some resources for you in EdBrite. Please access, download and read.

 

 

Other references

Please read from the following list in preparation for on-campus discussion and your later assignments.

 

Andrews, Alan, ed. 2010. The kingdom life: A practical theology of discipleship and spiritual formation. Colorado Springs, CO: NavPress.

Anderson, Keith R., and Randy D. Reese. 1999. Spiritual mentoring: A guide for seeking and giving direction. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Astley, J., and L. Francis, eds. 1992. Christian perspectives on faith development. Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans.

Bass, Diana Butler. 2002. Strength for the journey: A pilgrimage of faith in community. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

———. 2004. The practicing congregation: Imagining a new old church. Herndon, VA: Alban Institute.

———. 2006. Christianity for the rest of us: How the neighborhood church is transforming the faith. New York: Harper One.

Bass, Dorothy C., ed. 1997. Practicing our faith: A way of life for a searching people. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

———. 2000. Receiving the day: Christian practices for opening the gift of time. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Carlson, Kent, and Mike Lueken. 2011. Renovation of the church: What happens when a seeker church discovers spiritual formation. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Chan, Edmund. 2014. Radical Discipleship: Five defining questions. Singapore: Covenant Evangelical Free Church

Crisp, Tomas M., Porter, Steven L., and Ten Elshof, Gregg A. eds. 2019.  Psychology and Spiritual Formation in Dialogue: Moral and Spiritual Change in Christian Perspective. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press.

Everist, Norma C. 2002. The Church as learning community: A comprehensive guide to Christian education. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

Foster, C. R. 1994. Educating congregations: The future of Christian education. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

Foster, Richard J. 1989. Celebration of discipline: The path to spiritual growth. London: Hodder & Stoughton.

———. 1998. Streams of living water: Celebrating the great traditions of Christian faith. New York: HarperCollins.

Fowler, James. 1995. Stages of faith: The psychology of human development and the quest for meaning. New York: HarperCollins.

Frost, Michael, and Alan Hirsch. 2003. The shaping of things to come: Innovation and mission for the 21st-century church. Erina, New South Wales: Strand.

Guder, Darrell L., ed. 1998. Missional church: A vision for the sending of the church in North America. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.

Hawkins, G. L., and C. Parkinson. 2007. Reveal: Where are you? The answer will transform your church. Barrington, IL: Willow Creek Resources.

———. 2008. Follow me: What’s next for you? Barrington, IL: Willow Creek Resources.

———. 2011. Move: What 1,000 churches reveal about spiritual growth. Barrington, IL: Willow Creek Association.

Herrington, J., M. Bonem, and J. H. Furr. 2000. Leading congregational change: A practical guide for the transformational journey. New York: Jossey‑Bass.

Johnson, Suzanne. 1989. Christian spiritual formation in the church and classroom. Nashville, TN: Abingdon Press.

Kline, Peter, and Bernard Saunders. 1993. Ten steps to a learning organization. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City, UT: Great River Books.

Kouzes, James M., and Barry Z. Posner, eds. 2004. Christian reflections on the leadership challenge. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Loder, James E. 1989. The transforming moment. 2nd ed. Colorado Springs, CO: Helmers and Howard.

———. 1998. The logic of the spirit: Human development in theological perspective. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Osmer, Richard Robert. 2005. The teaching ministry of congregations. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox Press.

Peterson, Eugene H. 1996. Take and read: Spiritual reading, an annotated list. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.

———. 1997. Subversive spirituality. Grand Rapids, MI.: William B. Eerdmans.

———. 2010. Practice resurrection: A conversation on growing up in Christ. Grand Rapids,          MI: William B. Eerdmans.

Petit, Paul, ed. 2008. Foundations of spiritual formation: A community approach to becoming like Christ. P. Petit. Grand Rapids, MI: Kruger.

Reed, Angela H. 2011. Quest for spiritual community: Reclaiming spiritual guidance for contemporary congregations. New York: T&T Clark International.

Schwarz, Christian A. 2000. Natural church development: A guide to eight essential qualities of healthy churches. 4th ed. Emmelsbüll, Germany: ChurchSmart Resources.

Tacey, David. 2020. The Postsecular Sacred: Jung, soul, and meaning in an age of change. New York: Routledge

Volf, Miroslav. 1998. After our likeness: The Church as the image of the Trinity. Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans.

Willard, Dallas. 1988. The spirit of the disciplines: Understanding how God changes lives. New York: HarperCollins.

———. 1998. The divine conspiracy: Rediscovering our hidden life in God. New York: HarperCollins.

Willard, Dallas and Black, Gary. 2014. The divine conspiracy continued: Fulfilling God’s kingdom on earth. New York: HarperCollins.

 

Appendix: Writing a critical book review

 

A book review is not the same thing as a book report, which simply summarizes the content of a book. When writing a book review, you not only report on the content of the book but also assess its strengths and weaknesses. Students sometimes feel unqualified to write a book review; after all, the author of the book is a professional historian. However, even if you cannot write from the same level of experience and knowledge as the author, you can write an effective review if you understand what the assignment requires. In writing a review you do not just relate whether or not you liked the book; you also tell your readers why you liked or disliked it. It is not enough to say, “This book is interesting”; you need to explain why it is interesting. Similarly, it is not enough to report that you disliked a book; you must explain your reaction. Did you find the book unconvincing because the author did not supply enough evidence to support his or her assertions? Or did you disagree with the book’s underlying assumptions?

 

To understand your own reaction to the book, you need to read it carefully and critically. As a critical reader, you are not passive; you should ask questions of the book and note reactions as you read. Your book review then discusses those questions and reactions. Though there is no one “correct” way to structure a review, the following is one possible approach.

 

·         Summarise the book and relate the author’s main point, or thesis. (Somewhere early in the paper identify the author briefly.) [One paragraph]

·         Describe the author’s viewpoint and purpose for writing; note any aspects of the author’s background that are important for understanding the book. [One paragraph]

·         How does the author develop his main point/thesis? What important evidence does the author present to support his or her thesis? [One or two paragraphs]

·         Evaluate the author’s use of evidence, and describe how he or she deals with counter evidence. Are they based on sound biblical exegesis and evangelical theology? How does he/she use the Bible? As proof texts? Is it central to his main presentation? Are his/her points realistic, i.e., based on human experience, or are they just theoretical? [One paragraph]

·         Is the book’s argument convincing? Are his suggestions practical? If so why, if not, why not. Cite examples from the text. [One paragraph]

·         (Optional) Compare this book with other books or articles you have read on the same subject. [One paragraph]

·         Conclude with a final evaluation of the book and a personal reflection. You might discuss who would find this book useful and why. What impresses you the most and why? What major lessons did you learn? [One or two paragraphs]

 

NOTE: “Critical” does not mean negative; sceptical does not mean cynical. If a book is well written and presents an original thesis supported by convincing evidence, say so. A good book review does not have to be negative; it does have to be fair and analytical.

 

A good book review is not just a string of paragraphs in answer to the guideline above. It must be written with a smooth, coherent style, logically connected and easy to read.

 

* * * * * * *

 

(Adapted from “How to Write Book Reviews for Michael Kucher’s Classes at UWT.” http://courses.washington.edu/tande/book_reviews.htm, accessed 14 July 2011.)


 

 

Research Paper Assessment

 

Name__________________________________________ Date___________

 

Topic_________________________________________________________

 

                                                          High extant                                                               Low extant

standards

Excellent Criteria achieved to a high extent

Mostly well done, minor flaws                      

Good, but room for improvements

Only just satisfactory                   

Inadequate

Overview

 

 

 

 

 

Understand assignment purpose & structure

 

 

 

 

 

Identification of key issues

 

 

 

 

 

Clearly presented

 

 

 

 

 

Significant in scope

 

 

 

 

 

Appropriate rationale

 

 

 

 

 

Discussion section

 

 

 

 

 

Able to identify differences/similarities

 

 

 

 

 

Discusses rather than merely describes

 

 

 

 

 

Ability to interact/critique resources

 

 

 

 

 

Relates to course resources

 

 

 

 

 

Insight clear and logical

 

 

 

 

 

Challenges/difficulties identified

 

 

 

 

 

Suitable selection of issues

 

 

 

 

 

Clearly stated means to overcome

 

 

 

 

 

Personal Implication

 

 

 

 

 

Clear insights

 

 

 

 

 

Sense of honesty and realism

 

 

 

 

 

Presentation

 

 

 

 

 

Writing style- clear and appropriate

 

 

 

 

 

Spelling and grammar accurate

 

 

 

 

 

Proper references given

 

 

 

 

 

 

General Comments:

 

 

 

 

Assessment

 

HD (High distinction)

Excellent work in all aspects of the assignment.

C (Credit)

Mostly good work, with some flaws.

BP (Borderline pass)

Just enough strengths not to fail.

[This grade applies only to the present piece of work.]

 

 

 

 

 

D (Distinction)

Generally very good quality.

P (Pass)

Work is satisfactory: many good points, but some more serious flaws.

F (Fail)

Unsatisfactory in too many respects to pass.

 

 

 

 

 


 

Grade

AGST Assessment Criteria

High Distinction (HD)

Excellent quality – indicating…

1.        excellent coverage of the topic; accurate in detail offering sophisticated, even original insights; excellent use of examples to demonstrate understanding; clear understanding of complex ideas and issues.

2.        extensively researched in breadth and/or depth and accurately referenced.

3.        imaginative, insightful, original, creative interpretations; impressive level of critical analysis and evaluation.

4.        a persuasive, authoritative coherent argument supported throughout by evidence, ability to show limitations of approaches; systematic and cogent structure.

5.        evidence of sophisticated, critical reflection and evaluation of personal and/or professional ministerial practice.

6.        written with style; fluent and confident; lucidly expressed and accurate in spelling and grammar.

Distinction

(D)

Very good quality – indicating…

1.        high level of coverage of the topic; accurate in detail with some originality and innovative insights; good use of examples to demonstrate understanding; clear understanding of complex ideas and issues.

2.        widely researched in breadth and/or depth and accurately referenced.

3.        insightful and creative interpretations; high level of critical analysis and evaluation.

4.        a persuasive, coherent argument supported throughout by evidence, some ability to show limitations of approaches; systematic and cogent structure.

5.        evidence of a high level of critical reflection and evaluation of personal and/or professional ministerial practice.

6.        fluent and confident; lucidly expressed and accurate in spelling and grammar.

Credit

(C)

Good quality – indicating…

1.        topic is covered in depth; detail is accurate throughout; independence of thought; good identification and understanding of complex ideas and issues.

2.        well researched and referenced.

3.        perceptive, thoughtful interpretations; good level of critical analysis and evaluation; systematic analysis of source material.

4.        presence of a cogent argument, supported throughout by evidence; the work is well structured.

5.        evidence of critical reflection, understanding and evaluation of personal and/or professional ministerial practice.

6.        lucidly expressed and accurate in spelling and grammar.

Pass

(P)

Satisfactory quality – indicating…

1.        most relevant issues are covered with reasonable understanding; adequate knowledge is demonstrated; most central issues are identified.

2.        reasonable range of reading, sources not always explicit; not all referencing may be accurate.

3.        material from a variety of sources is drawn together in interesting ways; development of analysis may not be consistent, giving way to description.

4.        demonstrates the ability to construct an argument and present supporting evidence; links between introduction and conclusion are made.

5.        some attempt is made to reflect critically and evaluate; reference is made to personal and/or professional/ministerial practice.

6.        reasonably clearly written, albeit with a number of errors in spelling and grammar.

Borderline Pass (BP)

Of doubtful quality for a pass, but there are just enough strengths to allow a pass grade to be awarded rather than Fail.

Fail

(F)

Unsatisfactory quality – indicating…

Either the work is unsatisfactory, deficient and/or insufficient in many respects, relating to both mastery of content and expression;

Or work is not submitted, is excessively late, or has been produced by cheating.

Incomplete

(I)

[Distinguished from a failing grade]

Work is not completed/submitted.

 

 

 

 

For the purposes of comparison, this grading scale may be compared with other frequently used grading scales. Note that these are comparisons are approximations only.

(This is a common percentage point scale used in a number of British Commonwealth countries.)

 

AGST Alliance

Grade

Common descriptor

Percentage equivalent[1]

Letter equivalent

Grade point equivalent

High Distinction

Excellent

85% +

A

4.0

Distinction

Very good

75-84%

B+/A-

3.6

Credit

Good

65-74%

B/B+

3.2

Pass

Satisfactory

50-64%

C+/B-

2.6

Borderline pass

Marginal

40-50%

C-/C

2.0 – 2.3

Fail

Unsatisfactory

Below 40%

F

< 2.0

 

 

 

 

 

 


 

 

                                                         

"treat, heal, and comfort always"

 "spiritual forming disciples of Jesus Christ with informed minds, hearts on fire and contemplative in actions"  

 

     
Website Articles Spiritual Writings Nurture/ Courses Engaging Culture Medical Interests Social

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

   
           

 

  Creative Commons License

Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is
licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License

© 2006-2024  Alex Tang